Astra T2, T4, and T6 Implantable Pacemaker Pulse-Generator
510(k) K865013
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK865013 | Date19 Feb 1987 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- Full name
- Astra T2, T4 and T6
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- DXY
- Device Class
- Class III
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 870.3610
- Advisory Committee
- Cardiovascular
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 18 Sep 2026
The Astra T2, T4, and T6 are implantable pacemaker pulse-generators designed to regulate heart rhythm by delivering electrical impulses to the heart muscle when necessary. These devices are classified as Class III medical devices under FDA regulations, requiring premarket approval due to their role in managing life-sustaining or supporting functions.
These pulse-generators are intended for single-patient use and are implanted subcutaneously in the chest. They are regulated under FDA 510(k) clearance (K865013) and fall under the product code DXY, adhering to the regulatory requirements for cardiovascular devices. No additional sterility, MRI safety, or reusable specifications are noted in the provided data.
Other devices from Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 18 Sep 2026
Are the Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemakers intended for reuse with multiple patients, or are they single-use devices?
The Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemaker pulse-generators are explicitly designed for single-patient use only. Since they are implanted subcutaneously in the chest, they are not intended to be shared or reused across patients, adhering to standard practices for implantable medical devices.
What are the key differences between the Astra T2, T4, and T6 models, and how might a clinician choose between them?
The provided data does not specify technical or functional differences between the Astra T2, T4, and T6 models beyond their classification as implantable pacemaker pulse-generators. Selection would typically depend on clinical factors such as pacing requirements, patient anatomy, or compatibility with other components (e.g., leads). For precise guidance, consult the manufacturer’s clinical documentation or technical specifications, as these models may vary in programming capabilities, battery life, or other performance metrics not detailed here.
How are the Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemakers regulated by the FDA, and what does the product code DXY indicate?
The Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemakers are regulated under FDA 510(k) clearance (K865013) and classified as Class III devices, requiring premarket approval due to their role in life-sustaining functions. The product code DXY categorizes them under the FDA’s cardiovascular device classification, specifically for implantable pacemaker pulse-generators, aligning with their intended use for regulating heart rhythm via electrical impulses.
Do the Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemakers come with any specific storage or handling instructions, particularly regarding sterility?
The data does not provide explicit sterility specifications or storage instructions for the Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemakers. However, as implantable devices, they are typically packaged in sterile, single-use packaging to prevent contamination before implantation. For proper handling, storage, and expiration details, refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU) or packaging labels, as these are critical for maintaining device integrity and patient safety.
What is the historical context of the FDA’s review process for these pacemakers, and how was their substantial equivalence determined?
The Astra T2, T4, and T6 pacemakers were submitted to the FDA under a Traditional 510(k) pathway and received clearance on February 19, 1987, with a decision code of SESE (Substantially Equivalent in Safety and Effectiveness). This determination was made by the Cardiovascular (CV) Advisory Committee, comparing them to a predicate device already on the market. The review process confirmed they met the FDA’s requirements for cardiovascular implantable pulse generators, ensuring they performed similarly to existing approved devices while maintaining safety standards.