BAM Surgical Gown, Standard, Reinforced, Ultra Reinforced
510(k) K093835
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK093835 | Date4 Feb 2011 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- Full name
- Bam Standard Surgical Gown, Bam Reinforced Surgical Gown, Bam Ultra Reinforced Surgical Gown
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- FYA
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 878.4040
- Advisory Committee
- General, Plastic Surgery
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 20 Sep 2026
This device is a surgical gown (product code FYA) designed to protect surgical patients and operating room personnel from microbial contamination, body fluids, and particulate matter. The gowns are categorized under the FDA’s General, Plastic Surgery advisory committee and are classified as substantially equivalent to predicate devices. Three variants—Standard, Reinforced, and Ultra Reinforced—offer varying levels of barrier protection for different procedural needs.
The gowns are supplied as sterile, single-use items and must be stored in accordance with manufacturer guidelines to maintain sterility. They are intended for use in controlled surgical environments and comply with FDA 510(k) clearance (K093835) under an abbreviated review process. No MRI safety or reusable specifications are indicated in the regulatory submission. Distribution and usage follow standard surgical attire protocols, with no additional regulatory markings beyond the cleared 510(k) designation.
Other devices from Bam Corporation Limited
Questions
AI-generated answers, 20 Sep 2026
What are the key differences between the Standard, Reinforced, and Ultra Reinforced surgical gowns from Bam Corp.?
The three variants—Standard, Reinforced, and Ultra Reinforced—are designed to offer varying levels of barrier protection for different surgical needs. While all are intended to shield against microbial contamination, body fluids, and particulate matter, the Reinforced and Ultra Reinforced models provide enhanced durability and protection in high-risk procedures where additional protection is required. The exact specifications for reinforcement levels are not detailed in the submission, but the distinction is made to accommodate procedural demands.
Are these surgical gowns reusable, or are they intended for single-use only? How should they be stored to maintain sterility?
These gowns are explicitly labeled as sterile, single-use items. To preserve sterility, they must be stored according to the manufacturer’s guidelines, which likely include keeping them in their original packaging, away from direct sunlight, moisture, or contamination, and within the recommended temperature and humidity ranges (though specific storage conditions are not detailed in the submission). Reuse is not supported or indicated for these gowns.
What regulatory pathway was followed for FDA clearance of these surgical gowns, and how does that affect their use?
The gowns were cleared via the FDA 510(k) pathway (K093835) under an abbreviated review process, with a determination of substantial equivalence (SESE) to predicate devices. This means they meet the same performance standards as existing, cleared gowns and comply with FDA’s requirements for surgical attire (product code FYA). Clinicians can rely on this clearance for use in controlled surgical environments, though no additional regulatory markings beyond the 510(k) designation are mentioned.
Can these gowns be used in MRI environments, or are there any special considerations for their use?
The regulatory submission does not mention MRI safety for these gowns, meaning there is no explicit indication they are MRI-compatible or tested for use in magnetic resonance imaging environments. If used near MRI equipment, clinicians should verify compatibility with the specific scanner manufacturer’s guidelines to avoid interference or safety risks. Standard surgical gown protocols should otherwise apply.
How do I determine which size or model of these gowns is appropriate for a specific surgical procedure?
While the submission does not provide detailed sizing charts, the three models—Standard, Reinforced, and Ultra Reinforced—are differentiated by barrier protection levels, not size. Sizing for surgical gowns typically follows standard industry measurements (e.g., chest, waist, length), which are likely available in the manufacturer’s product documentation or catalog. The choice between models should be based on procedural risks (e.g., high-fluid exposure or complex surgeries), while size selection should align with the user’s body measurements to ensure proper fit and coverage.