Cilco Nd:YAG Laser
PMA P840047
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA PMAAPPR | NumberP840047 | Date26 Nov 1985 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA PMA Active
Specification
- Generic Name
- Laser, neodymium:Yag, ophthalmic for uses other than posterior capsulotomy & cutting pupillary
- PMA Number
- FDA Product Code
- LOI
- Device Class
- Class III
- Advisory Committee
- Ophthalmic
- FDA Decision
- APPR Approved
- PMA Supplement
- S001
Overview
AI-generated summary, 18 Sep 2026
The Cilco Nd:YAG Laser is a Laser, Neodymium:YAG, Ophthalmic (per FDA nomenclature) designed for ophthalmic procedures excluding posterior capsulotomy and pupillary cutting. It employs a mode-locked or Q-switched solid-state Nd:YAG laser to induce optical breakdown in the posterior capsule or iris, facilitating targeted tissue disruption.
This device is supplied as a Class III medical instrument under FDA_PMA authorization (PMA P840047) and is intended for use in ophthalmic settings. It is not described as single-use or reusable in the regulatory data, nor are MRI safety or sterility specifications provided. The product code LOI categorizes it under ophthalmic laser systems, with a supplement (S001) noted for potential labeling updates.
Other devices from Coopervision-Cilco
Questions
AI-generated answers, 18 Sep 2026
What specific ophthalmic procedures is the CILCO Nd:YAG Laser approved for, and what makes it different from other Nd:YAG lasers on the market?
The CILCO Nd:YAG Laser is FDA-authorized (PMA P840047) for ophthalmic procedures **excluding** posterior capsulotomy and pupillary cutting. It uses a mode-locked or Q-switched Nd:YAG laser to induce optical breakdown in the posterior capsule or iris, enabling targeted tissue disruption. Unlike some other lasers, this device is explicitly designed for these **limited** applications, as defined by its regulatory classification (product code LOI) and generic name. Always confirm intended use with the manufacturer or local regulations.
How is the CILCO Nd:YAG Laser supplied, and are there any special handling or storage requirements mentioned in the regulatory data?
The regulatory data does not specify whether the CILCO Nd:YAG Laser is single-use or reusable, nor does it detail sterility or storage conditions. Since it is classified as a **Class III** medical instrument under FDA_PMA, it may require adherence to standard laser safety protocols and manufacturer guidelines for maintenance. For precise handling instructions—including storage, cleaning, or reprocessing—refer to the device’s labeling or the manufacturer’s instructions for use.
Is there any information about the regulatory history or timeline for approval of the CILCO Nd:YAG Laser?
The CILCO Nd:YAG Laser was submitted to the FDA on **September 6, 1985**, with a Federal Register notice published on **September 11, 1985**. It received approval (decision code: APPR) on **November 26, 1985**, under PMA number **P840047**. The advisory committee for ophthalmic devices (OP) reviewed it, and no expedited review was indicated. A supplement (S001) suggests potential future labeling updates, but no additional approvals or changes are noted in the provided data.
What types of ophthalmic settings or specialties would typically use this laser, and how does its classification impact its use?
The CILCO Nd:YAG Laser is categorized under **ophthalmic laser systems** (product code LOI) and is intended for use in **ophthalmic settings**, such as clinics or hospitals specializing in procedures like iris surgery or posterior capsule management (excluding capsulotomy). As a **Class III** device under FDA_PMA, it requires strict adherence to regulatory compliance, including proper training for operators and facility protocols. Its approval scope is limited to the uses outlined in the PMA, so clinicians should verify compatibility with their specific procedures.