Dispos Access External Cardiac Pacemaker
by Keller Medical Specialties Products, Inc.
510(k) K903437
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK903437 | Date16 Nov 1990 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- DRO
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 870.5550
- Advisory Committee
- Cardiovascular
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 23 Sep 2026
This device is an external transcutaneous (non-invasive) cardiac pacemaker. It is designed for temporary cardiac pacing through the skin without surgical implantation.
It is supplied as a disposable, single-use device. The device received FDA 510(k) clearance (K903437) on November 16, 1990, and is classified as a Class II medical device under regulation number 870.5550.
Other devices from Keller Medical Specialties Products, Inc.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 23 Sep 2026
What is the DISPOS ACCESS External Cardiac Pacemaker used for?
It is designed for temporary cardiac pacing through the skin without surgical implantation, providing non-invasive transcutaneous pacing for short-term support.
Is the DISPOS ACCESS External Cardiac Pacemaker reusable or single-use?
It is supplied as a disposable, single-use device, meaning it is intended for one patient and one procedure only, then discarded to prevent cross-contamination.
How is the DISPOS ACCESS External Cardiac Pacemaker supplied?
The device is supplied as a sterile, disposable unit for single-use application, packaged ready for immediate clinical use in temporary pacing scenarios.
What regulatory pathway was used for the DISPOS ACCESS External Cardiac Pacemaker?
It received FDA 510(k) clearance under K903437 on November 16, 1990, demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device.