Skip to content

ESPIN System

by Nlt Spine, Ltd.

510(k) K133061

Active United States

510(k)

Valid until

No expiry

510(k) clearance is not time-limited

FDA recalls

None found

in data synced 22 Oct 2026

Documents

Trust

Unverified

Registry data, not yet checked by deviCERTS. Source FDA 510(k), synced 22 Oct 2026. What this means

Regulatory status

as of registry sync 22 Oct 2026

RegionAuthorizationNumberDateStatus
United StatesFDA 510(k)SESE Substantially Equivalent · Traditional NumberK133061 Date27 Nov 2013ClearedStatusActive

Recalls

0 recalls · FDA

No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.

Coverage

1 jurisdiction

United States of America
  • Active
  • Expiring
  • Withdrawn
  • Listed
  • Not covered

United States — FDA 510(k) Active

Specification

510(k)

510(k) Number
FDA Product Code
HRX
Device Class
Class II
Regulation
21 CFR Part 888.1100
Advisory Committee
Orthopedic
FDA Decision
SESE Substantially Equivalent

Overview

AI-generated summary, 19 Sep 2026

Written by a language model from registry data. Not verified by deviCERTS or the manufacturer. The registry data above is the record.

The ESPIN System is classified as an Orthopedic Device for spinal surgery, specifically designed as a minimally invasive instrument system for lumbar interbody fusion procedures. It facilitates precise placement of interbody cages and other spinal implants while minimizing trauma to surrounding tissues.

This system is supplied sterile and intended for single-use in surgical settings. It is approved under FDA 510(k) clearance (K133061) as substantially equivalent to a predicate device, with no third-party review. The system is engineered for use in minimally invasive spine procedures, adhering to orthopedic surgical standards without MRI compatibility restrictions.

Other devices from Nlt Spine, Ltd.

  • Prow Fusion-L

    Class II
  • Prow Fusion

    Class II
  • Prow Fusion-V

    Class II
  • Espin

    Class II
  • Prow Fusion

    Class II
  • Prow Fusion

    Class II

See all devices from Nlt Spine, Ltd. →

Questions

AI-generated answers, 19 Sep 2026

Written by a language model from registry data. Not verified by deviCERTS or the manufacturer. The registry data above is the record.

  • What types of spinal surgeries is the ESPIN System specifically designed for, and how does it reduce patient trauma during procedures?

    The ESPIN System is designed for lumbar interbody fusion procedures, a common orthopedic surgery used to stabilize the spine by fusing vertebrae together. It is engineered as a minimally invasive instrument system, which means it is built to facilitate precise placement of interbody cages and other spinal implants while causing less trauma to surrounding tissues compared to traditional open-surgery methods. This reduces postoperative pain, recovery time, and potential complications.

  • Is the ESPIN System reusable or single-use, and how should it be stored to maintain sterility?

    The ESPIN System is intended for single-use only in surgical settings, as specified by the manufacturer. Since it is supplied sterile, it must be stored in its original packaging until use to preserve sterility. After opening, any unused components should not be reused to prevent infection risks.

  • What regulatory pathway did the ESPIN System follow to gain FDA clearance, and what does this mean for its safety and equivalence?

    The ESPIN System received FDA 510(k) clearance (K133061) under the Traditional Review pathway, meaning it was determined to be substantially equivalent to a previously approved predicate device. This classification indicates that the FDA reviewed its design, materials, and intended use to confirm it meets the same safety and effectiveness standards as the existing device. There was no third-party review involved in this process.

  • Can the ESPIN System be used in procedures that require MRI compatibility, and what are its key limitations?

    The ESPIN System is not MRI-compatible, meaning it should not be used in patients who require MRI scans postoperatively. This limitation is due to the materials and design of the system, which may interfere with MRI imaging. Clinicians should confirm with radiology teams before proceeding with surgery if MRI follow-up is anticipated.