Hitachi Electronic Thermometer Model HK-10TA
by Hitachi Sales Corporation of America
510(k) K864089
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK864089 | Date7 Nov 1986 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- FLL
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 880.2910
- Advisory Committee
- General Hospital
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 22 Sep 2026
This device is an electronic clinical thermometer, as defined by its device type and product code FLL. It is designed for measuring body temperature in a general hospital setting.
The device was cleared through the FDA 510(k) process under K864089 with a traditional clearance type and a substantially equivalent decision. It is supplied as a non-sterile, reusable electronic thermometer intended for use in general hospital environments, with no indications of sterility, single-use designation, MRI safety, or specific storage conditions provided in the data.
Other devices from Hitachi Sales Corporation of America
Questions
AI-generated answers, 22 Sep 2026
What is the Hitachi HK-10TA electronic thermometer used for?
The Hitachi HK-10TA is designed for measuring body temperature in a general hospital setting, as defined by its device type and product code FLL, with no additional clinical indications specified in the data.
Is the Hitachi HK-10TA sterile or single-use?
The device is supplied as non-sterile and reusable, with no indications of sterility, single-use designation, or specific storage conditions provided in the authorization data.
How was the Hitachi HK-10TA cleared for market?
The device received FDA 510(k) clearance under K864089 on November 7, 1986, through a traditional review process with a substantially equivalent decision based on predicate device comparison.