HYDRO-TEMP Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor
510(k) K200319
Active
Valid until
Not listed
FDA recalls
None foundTrust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE 510(k) | NumberK200319 | Date2 Apr 2020 | StatusActive |
| European Union | CE/MDD EUDAMED | Number— | Date— | StatusActive |
| European Union | CE/MDR EUDAMED | Number— | Date— | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
- European Union
- United States
Specification
- Full name
- HYDRO-TEMP Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor, HYDRO-TEMP Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor with Interface Cable
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- FMT
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 880.5130
- Advisory Committee
- General Hospital
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 18 Sep 2026
The Hydro-Temp Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor is a medical device classified as an infant radiant warmer accessory, designed to monitor and measure the skin surface temperature of neonates. It provides precise thermal data to support neonatal care and stability in clinical settings.
This device is supplied as a reusable sensor, intended for use in general hospital environments. It is authorized under FDA 510K clearance, MDD, and MDR regulations, with a device classification of Class II. The sensor may be paired with an interface cable for connectivity and is regulated under the FDA’s 880.5130 product code for infant radiant warmers.
Other devices from Deroyal Industries, Inc.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 18 Sep 2026
Is the Hydro-Temp Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor designed for single-use or reusable in clinical settings?
The Hydro-Temp Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor is explicitly described as a reusable device, intended for use in general hospital environments. This classification aligns with its regulatory submission under the FDA’s 510(k) pathway and its classification as a Class II medical device, which often includes reusable accessories for infant radiant warmers.
What types of connectivity options are available for this temperature sensor, and how does that affect its use?
The Hydro-Temp Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor can be used with or without an interface cable, depending on the model. The version paired with an interface cable allows for direct connectivity to monitoring systems, ensuring seamless integration with neonatal care equipment. This flexibility supports various clinical workflows where real-time thermal data is critical for infant stability.
How is the regulatory approval status of this device categorized, and what does that imply for its use in hospitals?
The Hydro-Temp Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor holds FDA 510(k) clearance, as well as compliance under the MDD (Medical Device Directive) and MDR (Medical Device Regulation). Its classification as a Class II device under FDA regulations indicates it has undergone rigorous review for safety and performance, ensuring it meets standards for use in general hospital settings as an accessory to infant radiant warmers.
What clinical environment is this sensor primarily intended for, and why is that important for buyers?
This sensor is explicitly designed for general hospital environments, particularly as an accessory for infant radiant warmers. Its regulatory submission under the FDA’s 880.5130 product code and advisory committee classification for General Hospital settings confirms its suitability for neonatal care units where precise temperature monitoring is essential. Buyers should prioritize this device if their facility requires reusable, hospital-grade thermal monitoring for newborns.
Are there multiple models or variations of this sensor, and if so, how do they differ in functionality?
Yes, there are two listed variations: the standalone Hydro-Temp Neonatal Skin Surface Temperature Sensor and the same sensor with an interface cable. The key difference lies in connectivity—the cable-equipped version enables direct data transmission to monitoring systems, while the standalone version may require additional adapters or manual reading. This distinction allows clinicians to choose based on their facility’s infrastructure and workflow needs.