Illumina Model 25, 40 and 55 CO2 Laser Systems
510(k) K895263
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK895263 | Date20 Oct 1989 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- GEX
- Models / Variants
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 878.4810
- Advisory Committee
- General, Plastic Surgery
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 19 Sep 2026
The Illumina Model 25, 40 and 55 CO₂ Laser Systems are powered laser surgical instruments designed for general and plastic surgery applications. These devices utilize carbon dioxide laser technology to provide precise tissue ablation, coagulation, and vaporization for surgical procedures.
These systems are supplied as reusable medical devices and are intended for use in controlled clinical environments. Each model is classified under FDA product code GEX, with FDA 510(k) clearance (K895263) granted under the Substantially Equivalent (SESE) decision. No specific sterility or MRI safety information is provided in the regulatory data.
Other devices from Heraeus Lasersonics, Inc.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 19 Sep 2026
Are the Illumina CO₂ Laser Systems designed for single-use or reusable in the operating room?
The Illumina Model 25, 40, and 55 CO₂ Laser Systems are reusable medical devices, intended for use in controlled clinical environments like surgical suites. Since they are not labeled as single-use, they must be properly cleaned, maintained, and sterilized between procedures to ensure safety and performance. Always follow manufacturer guidelines for reprocessing to comply with clinical standards.
What types of surgical procedures are these CO₂ laser systems typically used for?
These systems are powered laser surgical instruments designed for general and plastic surgery applications, where precise tissue ablation, coagulation, and vaporization are required. The FDA’s advisory committee classification under GEX (General/Plastic Surgery) reflects their intended use in controlled surgical settings, though the exact clinical applications would depend on surgeon preference and procedural needs.
How do the different model numbers (25, 40, 55) differ from one another?
The Illumina CO₂ Laser Systems come in three models—25, 40, and 55—though the regulatory data does not specify exact performance differences (e.g., power output, wavelength, or beam size). The numerical distinctions likely refer to output settings, wattage ranges, or handpiece configurations, which may influence surgical precision or tissue interaction. For precise specifications, consult the manufacturer’s technical documentation or user manual.
Do these laser systems require any special storage conditions, and are they compatible with MRI environments?
The regulatory data does not provide details on storage requirements for the Illumina CO₂ Laser Systems, so standard operating room conditions (clean, dry, protected from physical damage) should suffice. Regarding MRI safety, there is no explicit information in the provided data, meaning compatibility with MRI environments is not confirmed or addressed. Always verify MRI safety with the manufacturer before use in such settings.
How was the FDA clearance for these laser systems determined, and what does the ‘SESE’ decision mean?
The Illumina CO₂ Laser Systems received FDA 510(k) clearance (K895263) under the Substantially Equivalent (SESE) decision, meaning the FDA determined they are substantially equivalent to a legally marketed device already on the market. This classification was reviewed by the Surgical Devices (SU) Advisory Committee in 1989, with the decision based on comparisons to a predicate device rather than novel clinical breakthroughs. The ‘SESE’ label does not imply superiority but rather that the device meets existing safety and effectiveness standards.