Skip to content

Innofluor Phenytoin

by Innotron Diagnostics

510(k) K841706

Active United States

510(k)

Valid until

No expiry

510(k) clearance is not time-limited

FDA recalls

None found

in data synced 6 Oct 2026

Documents

Trust

Unverified

Registry data, not yet checked by deviCERTS. Source FDA 510(k), synced 6 Oct 2026. What this means

Regulatory status

as of registry sync 6 Oct 2026

RegionAuthorizationNumberDateStatus
United StatesFDA 510(k)SESE Substantially Equivalent · Traditional NumberK841706 Date22 May 1984ClearedStatusActive

Recalls

0 recalls · FDA

No FDA recalls found in the data synced 6 Oct 2026.

Coverage

1 jurisdiction

United States of America
  • Active
  • Expiring
  • Withdrawn
  • Listed
  • Not covered

United States — FDA 510(k) Active

Specification

510(k)

510(k) Number
FDA Product Code
LGR
Device Class
Class II
Regulation
21 CFR Part 862.3350
Advisory Committee
Clinical Toxicology
FDA Decision
SESE Substantially Equivalent

Overview

AI-generated summary, 19 Sep 2026

Written by a language model from registry data. Not verified by deviCERTS or the manufacturer. The registry data above is the record.

The Innofluor Phenytoin is a Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay designed for the quantitative measurement of total diphenylhydantoin (phenytoin) in biological samples. It operates by detecting phenytoin levels through fluorescence polarization technology, enabling precise clinical toxicology assessments.

This device is intended for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical toxicology settings and is supplied as a single-use reagent kit. It has received FDA 510(k) clearance under the classification of Class II (LGR product code) and is regulated under FDA regulation number 862.3350. Storage and handling conditions are not specified in the provided data.

Other devices from Innotron Diagnostics

Questions

AI-generated answers, 19 Sep 2026

Written by a language model from registry data. Not verified by deviCERTS or the manufacturer. The registry data above is the record.

  • What clinical setting is the Innofluor Phenytoin designed for, and how does it help in patient care?

    The Innofluor Phenytoin is specifically designed for clinical toxicology settings, where precise measurement of total diphenylhydantoin (phenytoin) levels in biological samples is critical. It uses fluorescence polarization immunoassay technology to quantify phenytoin concentrations, enabling clinicians to monitor drug levels in patients undergoing phenytoin therapy. This helps ensure therapeutic efficacy, detect toxicity, and guide dosing adjustments for safer treatment.

  • Is the Innofluor Phenytoin kit reusable, or is it meant for single-use only?

    The Innofluor Phenytoin is supplied as a single-use reagent kit, meaning each kit is intended for one testing session only. This design ensures accuracy and sterility, as reuse could introduce contamination or variability in results, which is critical for reliable clinical toxicology assessments.

  • What types of biological samples can the Innofluor Phenytoin measure, and how does the fluorescence polarization method work?

    The Innofluor Phenytoin is designed to measure total phenytoin levels in biological samples, though the exact sample types (e.g., serum, plasma, whole blood) are not specified in the data. The fluorescence polarization immunoassay works by binding phenytoin in the sample to a fluorescently labeled antibody. When phenytoin is present, it alters the rotation of the labeled antibody, changing the polarization of emitted fluorescence. This change is proportional to the phenytoin concentration, allowing precise quantification.

  • How is the regulatory status of the Innofluor Phenytoin determined, and what does the 'LGR' product code indicate?

    The Innofluor Phenytoin received FDA 510(k) clearance under the LGR (Low-Grade Risk) product code, classifying it as a Class II device in the Clinical Toxicology category. The 'LGR' designation indicates it is regulated under FDA regulation number 862.3350, meaning it undergoes premarket review to ensure safety and effectiveness while posing minimal risk compared to higher-grade devices. This clearance was granted in 1984 after being deemed substantially equivalent to a predicate device.