Laparoscopic Trocar Starter Scalpel
by Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic
510(k) K936154
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK936154 | Date4 Feb 1994 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- GCJ
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 876.1500
- Advisory Committee
- Gastroenterology, Urology
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 22 Sep 2026
The Laparoscopic Trocar Starter Scalpel is a surgical instrument designed for use in laparoscopic procedures. It functions as a starter tool to facilitate the initial incision required for trocar insertion.
This device is identified by FDA 510(k) number K936154 and is classified under regulation number 876.1500. It is manufactured by Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic and is intended for use within the fields of gastroenterology and urology.
Other devices from Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic
See all devices from Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic →
Questions
AI-generated answers, 22 Sep 2026
What is the primary function of the Laparoscopic Trocar Starter Scalpel?
This instrument is specifically designed for use in laparoscopic procedures. It serves as a starter tool to create the initial incision necessary for the subsequent insertion of a trocar.
In which medical fields is this device intended for use?
The device is intended for use within the clinical fields of gastroenterology and urology, as indicated by its classification under the relevant advisory committees.
What is the regulatory status of this surgical instrument?
The Laparoscopic Trocar Starter Scalpel is identified by FDA 510(k) number K936154. It was cleared through a traditional 510(k) submission process and determined to be substantially equivalent to existing devices.