Matrix 101 Negative Galvanic Generator
by Prn Medical
510(k) K844816
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK844816 | Date4 Apr 1985 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- GEI
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 878.4400
- Advisory Committee
- General, Plastic Surgery
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 6 Oct 2026
This device is an electrosurgical cutting and coagulation accessory, as defined by its classification name and product code GEI. It functions as a negative galvanic generator intended for use in general and plastic surgery procedures.
It is supplied as a reusable device and received FDA 510(k) clearance under number K844816 on April 4, 1985, following a traditional review process. The device was submitted by Prn Medical and is classified for use in general and plastic surgery settings.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 6 Oct 2026
What is the MATRIX 101 NEGATIVE GALVANIC GENERATOR used for?
The MATRIX 101 NEGATIVE GALVANIC GENERATOR functions as an electrosurgical cutting and coagulation accessory intended for use in general and plastic surgery procedures, as defined by its classification name and product code GEI.
Is the MATRIX 101 NEGATIVE GALVANIC GENERATOR reusable or single-use?
The device is supplied as a reusable device, meaning it is designed for multiple uses after appropriate cleaning and sterilization between procedures, as indicated in its FDA 510(k) submission details.
What regulatory clearance does the MATRIX 101 NEGATIVE GALVANIC GENERATOR have?
The MATRIX 101 NEGATIVE GALVANIC GENERATOR received FDA 510(k) clearance under number K844816 on April 4, 1985, following a traditional review process, and was found substantially equivalent to a predicate device.