Mecta-C with Titanium Markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with Titanium Markers
510(k) K172587
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK172587 | Date18 Sep 2017 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- ODP
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 888.3080
- Advisory Committee
- Orthopedic
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 19 Sep 2026
The Mecta-C with Titanium Markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with Titanium Markers are intervertebral fusion devices designed for spinal stabilization. These devices incorporate either titanium-coated or PEEK (polyether ether ketone) materials with integrated titanium markers, intended for use in cervical spine fusion procedures from C2 to T1.
These devices are supplied sterile and intended for single-use, requiring supplemental spinal fixation for proper stabilization. They are classified under the Orthopedic category and have received FDA 510(k) clearance as substantially equivalent to a predicate device. The titanium markers enhance radiographic visibility, aiding intraoperative and postoperative assessment.
Other devices from Medacta International S.A.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 19 Sep 2026
What types of materials are used in the Mecta-C and Mecta-C TiPEEK devices, and how does this affect their use in spinal procedures?
The Mecta-C device features a titanium-coated material, while the Mecta-C TiPEEK variant incorporates PEEK (polyether ether ketone) with integrated titanium markers. Both are designed for cervical spine fusion procedures from C2 to T1. The titanium markers in both devices enhance radiographic visibility, which is critical for accurate intraoperative and postoperative assessment, ensuring proper alignment and stabilization during spinal fusion.
Are these devices intended for reuse, or are they meant to be used only once? How should they be handled to maintain sterility?
The Mecta-C and Mecta-C TiPEEK devices are explicitly designed for single-use only. They are supplied sterile, so they should remain in their original packaging until immediately before use. Once opened or used, they must be discarded to prevent contamination and ensure patient safety. Proper sterile handling is essential to avoid compromising the device’s integrity or introducing infection risks.
What cervical spine levels can these devices be used for, and why is supplemental spinal fixation required?
These devices are approved for cervical spine fusion procedures from C2 to T1. Supplemental spinal fixation (e.g., screws, rods, or plates) is required because the Mecta-C and Mecta-C TiPEEK devices are intervertebral fusion cages—they provide structural support and bone-graft containment but rely on additional fixation to ensure proper stabilization and alignment of the spine during the fusion process.
How do the titanium markers in these devices benefit clinicians during surgery?
The integrated titanium markers in both the Mecta-C and Mecta-C TiPEEK devices improve radiographic visibility under X-ray or fluoroscopy. This helps clinicians visualize the device’s position intraoperatively and postoperatively, ensuring accurate placement, alignment, and monitoring of spinal fusion progress. Clear imaging is particularly important in cervical spine procedures where precision is critical.
What regulatory pathway was followed for FDA clearance of these devices, and what does ‘substantially equivalent’ mean in this context?
The Mecta-C and Mecta-C TiPEEK devices received FDA 510(k) clearance under the Orthopedic (OR) advisory committee, with a decision code of SESE (Substantially Equivalent, Special). This means the FDA determined they are substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device in terms of technology, performance, and intended use. The ‘special’ classification indicates a more detailed review was conducted, ensuring safety and effectiveness comparable to existing spinal fusion devices.