Modification Manual Pulmon Resuscitor/Pulmanex(Tm)
510(k) K913714
Active
Valid until
No expiry
FDA recalls
None foundDocuments
Trust
Unverified
Regulatory status
| Region | Authorization | Number | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA 510(k)SESE | NumberK913714 | Date1 Dec 1992 | StatusActive |
Recalls
No FDA recalls found in the data synced 22 Oct 2026.
Coverage
- Active
- Expiring
- Withdrawn
- Listed
- Not covered
United States — FDA 510(k) Active
Specification
- 510(k) Number
- FDA Product Code
- BTM
- Device Class
- Class II
- Regulation
- 21 CFR Part 868.5915
- Advisory Committee
- Anesthesiology
- FDA Decision
- SESE Substantially Equivalent
Overview
AI-generated summary, 1 Oct 2026
This device is a manual ventilator for emergency resuscitation, classified as a Ventilator, Emergency, Manual (Resuscitator) under FDA device classification. It is a modification of the Pulmanex(TM) resuscitator system, designed for manual ventilation support in emergency settings.
The device received FDA 510(k) clearance K913714 on December 1, 1992, and is classified as a Class II medical device under regulation number 868.5915. It is supplied non-sterile and intended for reuse, with no indication of MRI safety or specific storage requirements provided in the data.
Other devices from Life Design Systems, Inc.
Questions
AI-generated answers, 1 Oct 2026
What is the MODIFICATION MANUAL PULMON RESUSCITOR/PULMANEX(TM) used for?
This device is a manual ventilator designed for emergency resuscitation, providing manual ventilation support in emergency settings as a modification of the Pulmanex(TM) resuscitator system.
Is the MODIFICATION MANUAL PULMON RESUSCITOR/PULMANEX(TM) sterile or non-sterile when supplied?
The device is supplied non-sterile, as indicated in the specifications, and is intended for reuse after appropriate cleaning and disinfection procedures.
What regulatory pathway was used for the MODIFICATION MANUAL PULMON RESUSCITOR/PULMANEX(TM)?
The device received FDA 510(k) clearance under K913714 on December 1, 1992, and was determined to be substantially equivalent to a predicate device through a traditional 510(k) submission.