Skip to content

NexFoam 9110254

by Hemostasis, LLC

NexFoam 9110254 is a device classified as Unclassified made by Hemostasis, LLC, cleared under FDA 510(k) K102459 on 3 Dec 2010 and listed in FDA GUDID since 30 Sep 2020 (UDI-DI 00858439001453), active as of 22 Oct 2026.

Active United States. Also listed in GUDID (US).

510(k)

Valid until

No expiry

510(k) clearance is not time-limited

FDA recalls

None found

in data synced 22 Oct 2026

Documents

510(k) K102459

FDA submission, from GUDID

Trust

Unverified

Source GUDID, synced 22 Oct 2026.

Regulatory status

as of registry sync 22 Oct 2026

RegionAuthorizationNumberDateStatus
United StatesGUDID listing Number00858439001453 UDI-DI Date30 Sep 2020ListedStatusListed GUDID: in commercial distribution
United StatesFDA 510(k)SESE from GUDID Substantially Equivalent · Traditional NumberK102459 Date3 Dec 2010DecidedStatusActive

Official records

Across registries

2 registries list this device

  • FDA 510(k) K102459 decided 3 Dec 2010 Active
  • FDA GUDID UDI-DI 00858439001453 listed 30 Sep 2020 Listed

Timeline

2 dated events

  1. Cleared FDA 510(k) K102459
  2. Listed FDA GUDID 00858439001453

Coverage

1 jurisdiction

United States of America
  • Active
  • Expiring
  • Withdrawn
  • Listed
  • Not covered

United States — FDA 510(k) Active

Specification

GUDID

Trade name
NexFoam
Generic name
Plant polysaccharide haemostatic agent, non-bioabsorbable, non-antimicrobial
Model / reference
9110254
Primary DI / UDI-DI
00858439001453
510(k) Number
FDA product code
FRO
GMDN term
Plant polysaccharide haemostatic agent, non-bioabsorbable, non-antimicrobial
Device class
U
GUDID distribution status
In Commercial Distribution
Size
Length — 1.9 Inch
Width — 0.6 Inch

Similar devices

Other devices filed under FDA product code FRO (Dressing, Wound, Drug).

Other devices from Hemostasis, LLC

See all devices from Hemostasis, LLC →

Properties

  • Supplied sterile
  • Single use
  • Prescription use
  • Lot / batch number
  • Expiration date
Other properties (10, all answered No)