Skip to content

Quantib AI Node 2.4

by Quantib B.V.

Quantib AI Node 2.4 is a Class II device made by Quantib B.V., cleared under FDA 510(k) K200899 on 15 Jun 2020 and listed in FDA GUDID since 8 Nov 2021 (UDI-DI 08719689791162), active as of 23 Oct 2026.

Active United States. Also listed in GUDID (US).

510(k)

Valid until

No expiry

510(k) clearance is not time-limited

FDA recalls

None found

in data synced 23 Oct 2026

Documents

510(k) K200899

FDA submission, from GUDID

Trust

Unverified

Source GUDID, synced 23 Oct 2026.

Regulatory status

as of registry sync 23 Oct 2026

RegionAuthorizationNumberDateStatus
United StatesGUDID listing Number08719689791162 UDI-DI Date8 Nov 2021ListedStatusListed GUDID: in commercial distribution
United StatesFDA 510(k) from GUDID NumberK200899 Date15 Jun 2020IssuedStatusActive

Official records

Across registries

2 registries list this device

  • FDA 510(k) K200899 decided 15 Jun 2020 Active
  • FDA GUDID UDI-DI 08719689791162 listed 8 Nov 2021 Listed

Timeline

2 dated events

  1. Cleared FDA 510(k) K200899
  2. Listed FDA GUDID 08719689791162

Coverage

1 jurisdiction

United States of America
  • Active
  • Expiring
  • Withdrawn
  • Listed
  • Not covered

United States — FDA 510(k) Active

Specification

GUDID

Trade name
Quantib AI Node
Generic name
Radiology DICOM image processing application software
Model / reference
2.4
Primary DI / UDI-DI
08719689791162
510(k) Number
FDA product code
LLZ
GMDN term
Radiology DICOM image processing application software
Device class
Class II
Regulation number
892.2050
GUDID distribution status
In Commercial Distribution

Similar devices in this category

Other devices filed under Radiology DICOM image processing application software.

Other devices from Quantib B.V.

  • Quantib AI Node 2.2

    Class II
  • Quantib Prostate 2.0

    Class II
  • Quantib ND 2.2

    Class II
  • Quantib ND 1.8

    Class II

See all devices from Quantib B.V. →

Properties

  • Prescription use
  • Lot / batch number
Other properties (13, all answered No)