Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.
United StatesFDA applicant, unverified
- Devices
- 23
- FDA recalls
- 32
At a glance
Market reach
- United States
- FDA recalls
What Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. makes
Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. manufactures radiation therapy planning and delivery systems, including radiation treatment planning (RTP) workstations like the FOCUS and XIO systems, beam data acquisition systems, and specialized adapters such as the RECORD AND VERIFY MEVATRON ADAPTER. Their portfolio also includes contouring workstations (e.g., FOCUS PILOT) and compensating filters designed to enhance precision in radiation oncology workflows.
These devices are classified as Class II under FDA regulations and are supported by 510(k) clearances. The company’s products are listed in the U.S. regulatory database, adhering to FDA requirements for medical radiation devices.
Catalogue
Search and filter all 23 devicesFDA recalls
FDA recall records list 32 recalls initiated by Computerized Medical Systems, Inc., the earliest on 2006-11-09 and the most recent on 2012-04-30. By recorded status: 32 terminated. The reasons filed fall into these groups: software or firmware. A recall is often a precaution started by the manufacturer, and a count of records is not a verdict on a company.
2012
- 30 Apr 2012 Z-1644-2012 Not yet classified Terminated XiO will underestimate the dose delivered when the closed leaf gap is set to 0mm on XiO and a value other than 0mm is set on the accelerator.
- 5 Mar 2012 Z-1365-2012 Not yet classified Terminated An unnecessary dose refresh can occur in certain situations which causes inconsistencies in the Beam Doses and the Total Dose.
Full distribution text
2011
- 9 Jun 2011 Z-2919-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated The XiO Software currently prompts for entry of CT to ED data for a studyset. No indication is given that the Electron Density data should only be used for Photon and Electron calculations and either Relative Stopping Power or Mass Density should be used for Proton calculations (depending on the algorithm).
- 13 Jan 2011 Z-2561-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Monaco: For VMAT plans, the measured dose of radiation delivered is lower than the software calculated dose by about 5% in Monaco Release 2.03.00 and 2.04.00.
Full distribution text
- 13 Jan 2011 Z-2598-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Monaco: When the isocenter location is edited in the IMRT Activity screen, the shift coordinates are not updated in the IMRT Plan report.
Full distribution text
2010
- 16 Nov 2010 Z-2582-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO: When a new electron beam is added to a plan, the calculation Algorithm is set to Pencil Beam, and an Aperture is added to the beam, the user can select Port-Port Properties and edit the Material Thickness values. If the algorithm is then changed to Monte Carlo, the calculation will proceed and the user is not warned the Material/Thickness values just entered are not used in the dose calculati
Full distribution text
- 9 Nov 2010 Z-2562-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Focal: If a plan involving Dynamic MLC Delivery is sent from XiO to Focal and called up there in Plan Review, the angle of the gantry is set to zero for all beams. If this plan is then sent from Focal to the R&V System, the gantry angles all remain at zero which could lead to patient mistreatment.
Full distribution text
- 27 Oct 2010 Z-2569-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Monaco: In XiO IMRT (Dynamic MLC Delivery) software, the radiation beam angle is set to zero. If different beam angles are selected via Monaco software, the beam angles will remain at zero.
- 3 Oct 2010 Z-2579-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO: When the beam template is recalled, XiO prematurely initiates a dose calculation, re-snaps the MLC or Port to the structure of the current patient , but then fails to re-calculate dose for the new MLC or Port position. If no subsequent change is made to force a dose recalculation, XiO will display the dose from the original MLC/Port shape dose instead of the dose from the re-snapped MLC/Port
Full distribution text
- 17 Sep 2010 Z-2578-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated When a dialog box is displayed and the dose status is changed to "Dose not current", beam edits can be made in the graphics area using the mouse (rotate collimator, reposition collimator, move isocenter, move weight point, etc.). Then if CANCEL is selected on the dialog box, any edits made on the dialog box are undone, the dose is left unchanged, but the beam edits made in the graphics area with t
Full distribution text
- 16 Nov 2010 Z-2582-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO: When a new electron beam is added to a plan, the calculation Algorithm is set to Pencil Beam, and an Aperture is added to the beam, the user can select Port-Port Properties and edit the Material Thickness values. If the algorithm is then changed to Monte Carlo, the calculation will proceed and the user is not warned the Material/Thickness values just entered are not used in the dose calculati
Show the 25 most recent of 32 recalls
2010
- 10 Sep 2010 Z-2408-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated When RT Plans are exported from XiO and RT Structure Sets and Images are exported from Monaco, the DICOM iso-center coordinates may not be accurate.
Full distribution text
- 31 May 2010 Z-2564-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Monaco: due to a software defect, the Radiological Depth (cm) and SSD to DRP (cm) parameters are reported incorrectly on the Beam Summary Report. This occurs for all Monaco IMRT plans.
Full distribution text
- 28 May 2010 Z-2595-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO Software: when Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) are generated in XiO, and DICOM is used to export the DRRs (File-Print-DRR), the exported images are associated with the Beams, but NOT the Plan. The Plan association had always been done manually by the user. This is functionality that has never been provided on XiO. The problem occurs because XiO is not storing a persistent DICOM
Full distribution text
- 27 May 2010 Z-2407-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO Software: For a specific clinical setup, the MLC leaf positions on the exported DRR images might not match the MLC leaf positions displayed in XiO.
Full distribution text
- 27 May 2010 Z-2593-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO Software: The Patient Scan position is being confused with the treatment orientation of the patient. The Patient Scan position is determined from the data entered in PFM. Subsequently, when a New Teletherapy Plan is created for a patient in Teletherapy, the user is prompted with Head/Foot Gantry on the text page. This prompt is asking for the orientation of the patient when they are treated.
Full distribution text
- 19 May 2010 Z-2604-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO Software: when a treatment machine is defined in Source File Maintenance (SFM), the MLC Model is set to Elekta, and beams using this treatment machine are added to a new plan in Teletherapy, XiO automatically adds an MLC to the beam. This is because the Elekta linac will always have an MLC in place when the plan is actually delivered.
Full distribution text
- 10 May 2010 Z-2592-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Focal: for XiO plans calculated in relative dose mode, the Focal Plan Review application will display the DVH and maximum dose correctly. However, the isodose display is not scaled correctly. If the user evaluated the plan based only on the isodose display, they might misinterpret the actual dose delivered to the patient.
Full distribution text
- 15 Apr 2010 Z-1655-2010 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Under certain circumstances, XiO will over-estimate dose in the region where the backup jaw is inside the MLC opening
Full distribution text
- 22 Feb 2010 Z-1209-2010 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Inconsistent MLC positions, dose, and monitor units
Full distribution text
- 10 Sep 2010 Z-2408-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated When RT Plans are exported from XiO and RT Structure Sets and Images are exported from Monaco, the DICOM iso-center coordinates may not be accurate.
2009
- 11 Dec 2009 Z-2645-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated ERGO Release 1.6.3 is overestimating the MU values.
Full distribution text
- 12 Jun 2009 Z-2559-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Focal Software: When a patient is defined as prone and the shifts are manually entered and the LOCK SHIFT box is checked the X coordinate (left/right) and the Z coordinate (anterior/posterior) are reversed (left to right, anterior to posterior). This could potentially lead to incorrect isocenter definitions from prone patients and thus a mislocation of dose.
Full distribution text
- 13 May 2009 Z-2568-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated In XiO, when the beams are renumbered, it is possible to get into a state where the dose displayed for a beam does not match the beam placement on the patient. This can occur when dose is calculated, beams are renumbered, and the dose is re-summed only.
Full distribution text
- 6 Feb 2009 Z-2599-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Focal Software: if individual MLC leaf position edits are made, the original MLC aperture is retained. A subsequent aperture edit should not affect the MLC leaf positions however it was found that instead the leaves will then snap (unintentionally) back to the original aperture. Also, if the patient is sent to XiO after the MLC is edited, an isocenter shift made in XiO will also cause the MLCs to
Full distribution text
- 19 Jan 2009 Z-2594-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated Focal: the couch position can be moved between scans of the same CT study. When the images are imported into Focal, the software is not checking the DICOM Image Position (Patient) tag and therefore is not aligning the images sets if there are different couch positions indicated. A shift between image sets will exist of the same amount that the CT couch was moved.
Full distribution text
- 11 Dec 2009 Z-2645-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated ERGO Release 1.6.3 is overestimating the MU values.
2008
- 9 Dec 2008 Z-2567-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO Software: Under certain conditions, when the port shape is altered, dose is not recalculated. The port-change flag is not being set correctly when the port shape is regenerated. The dose distribution will not match the blocking displayed and the mis-match might not be obvious. Monitor Unit calculations will also be based on an incorrect dose distribution. This problem has existed since Re
Full distribution text
- 9 Dec 2008 Z-2567-2011 Unclassified (pre-2012) Terminated XiO Software: Under certain conditions, when the port shape is altered, dose is not recalculated. The port-change flag is not being set correctly when the port shape is regenerated. The dose distribution will not match the blocking displayed and the mis-match might not be obvious. Monitor Unit calculations will also be based on an incorrect dose distribution. This problem has existed since Re
Frequently asked questions
How many devices does Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. have in the registry?
The registry currently lists 23 devices for Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.. Devices recorded under merged duplicate company entries are counted once.
Which registries list Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.'s devices?
Among its 23 most recently registered devices, Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. has devices listed in FDA 510(k) (23 devices).
What risk classes do Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.'s devices fall under?
Among its 23 most recently registered devices, the classes recorded for Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.'s devices are Class II. Each device page shows its own class and authorisation.
Are there FDA recall records for Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.?
FDA recall records list 32 recalls initiated by Computerized Medical Systems, Inc., the most recent initiated on 30 Apr 2012. A recall is often a precaution started by the manufacturer; the records say nothing about the company's overall record.
What are the newest devices from Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. in the registry?
The most recently registered devices listed for Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. include FOCUS, MONACO RTP SYSTEM, ENHANCED COMPENSATING FILTER and FOCUS RTP SYSTEM.